Tom, the blurring of boundaries in Turmp's psyche seems is blatant and quiet problematic for the governing role he assumes. However, such blurring is blatantly occurring for justices on the Supreme Court, (i.e notion of reporting funding and taxation responsibilities, and when values and beliefs are co-mingled with legal precedence.) Could a clarity of mental boundaries be an ideal we strive for within our legal and civil structures? lynn alicia
Tom, the blurring of boundaries in Turmp's psyche seems is blatant and quiet problematic for the governing role he assumes. However, such blurring is blatantly occurring for justices on the Supreme Court, (i.e notion of reporting funding and taxation responsibilities, and when values and beliefs are co-mingled with legal precedence.) Could a clarity of mental boundaries be an ideal we strive for within our legal and civil structures? lynn alicia